Consumers Legaue tells you about steals and deals, low interest credit cards, what's going on in Washinton and Trenton

Join CLNJ Contact Us Newsletter Credit Cards Rent to Own Current Issues Suits NJ Legislature Congress Heroes and Zeroes Consumer Complaints Links CLNJ History Civics Lesson Privacy

Consumers League fights for the rights of consumers. Since 1900, the Consumers League of New Jersey has represented your interests against slippery salesmen and their friends in the halls of Congress and the state Legislature.

CLNJ Opposes A.3333 (2011), which evicerates N.J.'s Consumer Fraud Act.

The Consumers League, through its President Robert Russo has isued a statement opposing N.J. bill A.3333 (2011). Click here to read Mr. Russo's opposition. CLNJ President Robert Russo is the former Mayor of Montclair, and has retired as head of the Lemon Law unit at N.J. Division of Consumer Affairs..

What is wrong with A.3333?
First, A.3333 destroys the  Consumer Fraud Act’s strong remedy of triple damages by making it discretionary, not mandatory as it currently stands.
Second, A.3333 totally immunizes any company from any duty to comply with the Consumer Fraud Act if that company is regulated by any state or federal agency! Home repair contractors must get a license from the NJ Department of Banking. The N.J. Division of Consumer Affairs also has regulations about home repair contracts. Under A.3333, the existence of regulation means that the company is now unregulated! This absurd “Catch 22” cripples New Jersey’s law enforcement against consumer fraud.
Third,  A.3333 makes it harder for consumer to win a case by inserting that it is not enough to be swindled, but that the consumer must prove “reliance,” a tricky legal obstacle that the N.J. Legislature wisely never inserted into the CFA. The need to prove individual reliance, also kills consumer class actions. Consumers cannot band together when thousands of consumers are swindled out of modest amounts. Each victim must file her own lawsuit, and each must prove "reliance," but that will be impossible because attorneys won’t accept cases for such small amounts.
Fourth, A.3333 limits the amount of attorneys fees which the consumer lawyer (only) can recover in bringing a scammer to justice. There is no limitation on the attorneys fees which the fraudulent business may spend to bury the consumer attorney in motions, depositions and litigation costs. The intent is to discourage lawyers from acting as private attorneys general when the State is too busy to bring the suit, and to break the back of courageous consumer litigators.
Fifth, New Jersey’s small businesses would no longer be able to use the Consumer Fraud Act to sue companies which defraud them.
Sixth, A.3333 immunizes out-of-state scammers who defraud N.J. residents! If an internet company in Utah wants to charge illegal interest of 500% on a payday loan made to a NJ resident, then the victim might not be able to use the Consumer Fraud Act to sue the out-of-state scammers! New Jersey wisely prohibits debt consolidation scams, where the company collects $7000 upfront of the consumer's funds and falsely promises to settle her credit card debts, then pockets the money as "upfront fees" without settling any debts.  A.3333 would allow an out-of-state company to steal this cash from NJ consumers and keep it, free from worry about a Consumer Fraud Act suit.
A.3333 is unfair,  misguided, and  one-sided. A.3333 benefits only companies which defraud consumers. If A.3333 is enacted, New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act, currently ranked as the best in the nation, will sink to the worst.

CLNJ Opposes bills similar to A.695, would allow Rent to own stores to violate N.J.'s criminal usury law.

Assembly bill A695 (2008) was an industry bill intended to let rent to own stores break N.J.'s criminal usury law. The N.J. Supreme Court, in Perez v. Rent-a-Center (2006) decided that RTO stores must obey the 30% criminal usury law. A.695 says rent to own, alone of all stores selling goods on credit, can charge what amounts to 152% Annual percentage rate. CLNJ says the RTO stores, located mainly in urban areas, treat the poor as second class citizens, by charging them double what the middle class pays at the mall. The bill lets RTO stores first impose a whopping 175% markup for the "cash" price, then lets RTO double that for the credit price. So an item costing RTO $285 can be sold for $1000, which is 152% Annual Percentage Rate interest.

Read CLNJ's testimony opposing A.695.

Read AARP's testimony opposing A695.

Read what newspaper editorials said about similar bills in the past.

Bob Russo is New President of Consumers League of New Jersey

Congratulations to Bob Russo, who takes over as President of CLNJ in our 108th year. Bob is an expert on the Lemon Law, having been Lemon Law director for the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs. Bob also served as mayor of Montclair. He was consumer affairs director in Essex County as well. Best wishes to Bob on his new job.

Rent to own class action settled: Consumers to get refunds:
$ 109 Million to be Refunded to RTO customers

After the N.J. Supreme Court ruled that "rent to own" contracts at Rent-a-Center, which exceeded N.J.'s 30% criminal usury law would be illegal, the RAC company tried to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. That effort failed. RAC then settled the case. A Superior Court Judge approved the class action settlement on September 14, 2007. Consumers who had a rent-to-own contract with Rent-a-Center in New Jersey, during the period April 23, 1999 to March 16, 2006 are entitled to refunds. In general checks will be mailed directly to the RAC customers at their last known addresses. However, customers who have moved, or who are not contacted by mail, should go to this website:
for more information about how to claim your refunds. That website has a form for submitting questions as well.

Congratulations to the lawyers who litigated for many years to bring about this success for N.J. consumers: Mark Cuker, Esq., Seth Lesser, Esq. and William Riback, Esq.

Congratulations to the consumer groups who stood firm for the last twenty years in the state legislature, urging governement to protect consumers, not help fleece them: NJPIRG, CLNJ, Legal Services of New Jersey, the N.J. Public Advocate. On the national level: Consumer Federation of America, USPIRG, AARP, Consumers Union, and many others.

N.J. Supreme Court Rules Rent to Own Contract is Illegal:
80% Interest Violated N.J.'s Criminal Usury Law

The New Jersey Supreme Court on March 15, 2006 ruled that the rent to own contract of Rent-a-Center, as used in New Jersey in the case of Hilda Perez, was a Retail Installment Sales contract, and ruled that the maximum legal interest rate was the 30% limit of New Jersey's Criminal Usury Law. Therefore the 80% interest charged to Hilda Perez was illegal. You can read the full deciion in PDF format by clicking here.

Hilda Perez is a cook from Camden who paid over $8,000 to Rent-a-Center to purchase furniture and appliances. But the store wanted $18,000 for the items, which was an undiclosed 80% Annual Percentage Rate. When the store tried to take all the goods back, Ms. Perez sued Rent-a-Center. The N.J. Supreme Court decision means that rent to own stores cannot continue to charge N.J.'s poorest citizens interest rates of 80% or 100% or more. All stores must charge 30% or less.

For over twenty years Consumers League of New Jersey and NJPIRG (and all consumer groups) have aargued that rent to own practices are illegal in New Jersey. A similar decision, Grren v Continental Rentals in 1994 held that charging more than 30% interest was unconscionable amd illegal.

The N.J. Supreme Court decision levels the playing field. Now RTO must obey the same rules that merchants like Sears have always obeyed. CLNJ thinks that charging the urban poor 80% when the middle class pay 21% at the mall, is a form of profiling and discrimination. There are no rent to own stores in wealthy suburbs. Our poor citizens want the same things which others enjoy. The poor do not ask to be exploited. But poor RTO customers are never told the Annual Percentage Rate. To conceal the interest rate is inherently deceptive. The same $200 TV, which costs $240 on credit at Sears, will cost them $1000 at rent to own, (that is a 300% interest rate). No one wants to pay four times as much as the middle class pays. Hats off to the N.J. Suprme Court for having the courage protect the poor by enforcing the law. Now CLNJ asks, will the Executive and Legislative branches enforce that law? The purpose of government is to protect its citizens, not help companies fleec them.

What's next? The RTO industry will try to get the Legislature to legalize 150% interest for the urban poor, the same as what the RTO lobbyists tried to do in 2005, see article below.

Tribute to Louis Novellino, October 2006

Louis Novellino, a member of the Board of Directors of the Conumers League of New Jersey, has died. Click here to read our tribute to this consumer advocate.

Tribute to Professor Philip Shuchman

Please click here for a tribute to Professor Philip Shuchman, a true consumer advocate and CLNJ Board member, who died age 77.

Rent to Own Legislative Campaign 2005:

Consumers League Opposed A.3851 (2005), Bill A.3851 Would Allow Rent to Own Stores to charge interest at 152%- exceeding N.J.'s 30% Criminal Usury Ceiling. Click here for statement N.J. Government ought to protect poor urban consumers, not help stores fleece them.

Joint Letter of N.J. Consumer Groups : NAACP, NJPIRG, Consumers League of New Jersey, Citizen Action, Latino Leadership Alliance of N.J., Lutheran Office of Government Ministry Opposing bill A3851.

Letter of New Jersey AARP Opposing bill A2851

National Consumer Groups oppose N.J. bill A.3851.
Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, USPIRG, ACORN, Consumer Action, National Community Reinvestment Coalition.

What do N.J. Newspapers think about bills to legalize high interest for rent to own stores? Click here to read ten years of editorials opposing rent to own.

What did Asm. Wilfredo Caraballo say about rent to own when he was N.J. Public Advocate? Click here to read how the Public Advocate condemned rent to own as unconscionable.

The Consumers League filed an amicus brief in Perez v. Rent-a-Center, which decided that rent to own stores must obey N.J.'s criminal usury law. Read CLNJ's amicus brief in the New Jersey Supreme Court to learn the legal issues. In 1981 the Legislature made 30% the ceiling for all consumer credit in New Jersey.

The math of rent to own explained in two easy charts: What is the Annual Percentage Rate? Bill A.3851 would allows interest at 152% APR for rent to own stores.

RENT TO OWN RAP NOW AVAILABLE ON INTERNET AS FREE MP3 FILE! This is a public service announcement in rap format.

Bankruptcy "Reform" Act ("BARF") 2005:

How did New Jersey's Senators and Representative Vote on Bankruptcy "Reform?"

U.S House roll call votes, all states

Consumers League Opposed U.S. bill S.256, Bankruptcy "Reform" Act Hurts N.J. Consumers

Click on these two links to learn why the bankruptcy "reform" is bad for New Jersey. Use the [Back] button to return here.

February 2005 Harvard Study: Half of bankruptcies are caused by medical bills, inadequate health insurance

"Lies in Lending Act" -- Rent to Own bill HR 1701
When Rent to Own didn't get N.J Legislation, it turned to Congress

Rent to own: The ultimate scam: Shame on theU.S. House of Representatives, which voted 215 -201 in favor of H.R. 1701. This bill may legalize unlimited interest for Rent to Own stores, and PROHIBIT disclosure of the Annual Percentage Rate! We call it the "Lies in Lending Act." The House sided with the scam, instead of protecting the people.
CLNJ Position Paper on Rent to Own Bills in Congress: Oppose HR1701, Support HR2498

CLNJ salutes the twelve Representatives from New Jersey -- all N.J. members of the House who voted, voted against H.R. 1701. How did your representative vote? Click here for the Roll Call votes of all members on H.R. 1701. Shame on those who voted to make the House a partner in the rent to own scam! The government ought to protect the people, not help fleece them. Under H.R. 1701, the states and the Federal Reserve Board can't even tell the victims how bad the interest rate is. CLNJ calls interest rates of 100% to 300% scandalous.

Consumers League of NJ Newletters.

Arbitration: Did you "agree" to give up your day in Court forever?

CLNJ History: Congress put some ideas from CLNJ testimony into the US Home Equity Loan Consumer Protection Act, to prohibit "rate rise surprise." Congress also adopted a CLNJ plea to help save homes from foreclosure, by giving homeowners a chance to pay their mortgages though bankruptcy payment plans. More CLNJ History

Consumers League helps low income consumers with our rent to own campaign. Rent to own is a way to buy a $200 television for $1,000. CLNJ has the RENT TO OWN RAP, a 60 second public service announcement for radio in rap form. CLNJ distributes a pamphlet: With Rent to Own Your Paycheck's Blown, and a poster for civic groups.

Consumers League has submitted briefs as friend of the Court in consumer litigation.

Our opinions have been quoted in the media, from the Bergen Record to the Wall Street Journal.

But Consumers League can't do it alone- we need your help, that's why we ask that you Join CLNJ!

Consumers League of New Jersey is nonpartisan: CLNJ makes no endorsements and contributes no money to candidates. CLNJ gives you our honest opinions, and tries to persuade our elected officials to do what's right for consumers.

CLNJ Newsletter

Rent to own:
Class Action Settled

Supreme Court decision

Rent to Own RAP

RTO Math

Bankruptcy Law

Other amicus briefs


 Join CLNJ | Contact CLNJ | Newsletters |
Credit Cards | Rent to Own | Current Issues | Suits |
NJ Legislature | Congress | Heroes & Zeroes |
Consumer Links | History of Consumers League | Civics Lesson

Copyright 2011 by Consumers League of New Jersey,All rights reserved.

Contents provided under the understanding that the Consumers League provides general information for the public, and does not provide legal advice to any person. If you have a legal problem, please consult an attorney for advice specific to your facts and to the law of your specific jurisdiction.